Webpack: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== Pros === | === Pros === | ||
You put includes into the source and set an entry point for Webpack. This avoids having to update any Webpack configuration to accommodate changes in the source code. Easier to maintain. <ref | You put includes into the source and set an entry point for Webpack. This avoids having to update any Webpack configuration to accommodate changes in the source code. Easier to maintain. <ref>[https://www.toptal.com/front-end/webpack-browserify-gulp-which-is-better Webpack or Browserify & Gulp: Which Is Better?] - toptal.com</ref> | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 15:49, 8 September 2021
Overview
Webpack bundles JavaScript. It can also bundle other assets such as css, and images. I can compile SASS.
It can serve as an alternative to Gulp.
Pros
You put includes into the source and set an entry point for Webpack. This avoids having to update any Webpack configuration to accommodate changes in the source code. Easier to maintain. [1]
Notes
- ↑ Webpack or Browserify & Gulp: Which Is Better? - toptal.com